Doc Johnson Products
National Geographic Darwin Error
The November issue of National Geographic magazine (NG) posed the question "Is Darwin wrong? In coverage. Naturalist David Quammen author of the article of the same name, replied "No" to this question from their own point of view, and declared that evolutionary theory Darwin is supported by strong scientific evidence. Quammen repeated the key claims of the book Origin of Species Darwin, but overlooked a detail important.
Darwin added another chapter of his book, one called "Challenges to the theory," and admitted there were difficulties openly in these terms:
That is the sum of several main objections and difficulties that can justly be urged against my theory … I felt these difficulties far many years to doubt their weight. 1
The fact is, however, that the NG article did not discuss one of the phenomena that Darwin regarded as a problem for his theory, and even ignore their existence. For example, although Darwin refers in his book how the fossil record to protect their theory and complexity in eyes, NG magazine even touch on issues such as the theory of evolution is unable to realize that the Cambrian explosion, biological complexity and the origin of information genetics.
Quammen, which appears as a more Darwinian than Darwin himself appears as the defender is not a theory that can explain the problems, but a "Dogma" that must be protected from criticism.
In this article, the test call is analyzed, and the Darwinist propaganda by Quammen NG magazine refuted.
An example of dogmatic position of Turkey GN
English Edition Article NG "was Darwin wrong? Also devoted space to Harun Yahya's works on the theory of evolution. In the section that describes the reactions worldwide against evolution, the following words have appeared in reference Harun Yahya
Their distress is associated with Islamic creationists such as Harun Yahya, author of a recent book entitled The Evolution of deception, which points to the story the creation of six days in the Koran as the literal truth and calls the theory of evolution "more than a deception imposed on us by the dominant global system. "
Interestingly, Harun Yahya was not in GN Turkish version, and this section has been amended, assuming the following form: "This discomfort is shown a parallel between those who support the Islamic idea of creation. "
As a person who says their main goal, describe the philosophy and disability Harun Yahya's scientific Darwinism has closely followed the Darwinist propaganda in recent years years and has responded in the light of scientific discoveries, writings and programming for the evolution of media, including one GN. (See www.darwinism-watch.com)
If Darwinism really supported a mass of evidence, as argued in this article GN, GN-why Turkey is trying to prevent criticism of Harun Yahya scientists to be heard? Is it referred to Turkey that NG Darwinism is unable to support such scientific criticism? In fact, this attitude by the Office of GN, Turkey not only shows that the magazine not to inform their readers of the source of the criticism of current development, but also confirms the criticism that tries to keep the feet in Darwinism as an ideology.
NG does not face the facts of modern science
There is no doubt that to give a realistic response to the question "Is Darwin wrong? We look at what Darwin actually said and to compare with modern scientific facts. In his book The Origin of Species, which announced his theory of evolution, Darwin has provided a very important criterion to check his theory. Thus, concrete criterion is that Darwin's own words he would "absolutely break down" theory. Darwin wrote:
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not have been formed by numerous, successive modifications, mild, my theory would absolutely break. "2
Darwin argued that organisms evolve in a gradual process. Thinking in this imaginary process in reverse, it seems Darwin assumed that these bodies have reducibility. However, advances in the field of biochemistry, particularly during the last 40 years, revealed that the cell has more complexity, such details were not known at the time of Darwin, because that has been likened to a black "box" and that certain structures within the cell actually have the characteristics of "irreducible complexity."
"Irreducible complexity" is a phenomenon based on empirical evidence and is literally the antithesis of Darwin's theory. The most important number to put the concept on the agenda in the scientific world is the biochemist Michael J. Behe Lehigh University in the United States. In his 1996 book Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to evolution Behe examines the nature of irreducibly complex cell and some other biological structures, and reveals that absolutely can not be represented in terms of evolution. Behe describes the effect that irreducible complexity has on the claims of Darwinism as follows:
"For Darwin, the cell was a" box black "- the wheels have been quite mysterious to him. Now, the black box has been opened and we know how it works. Applying the approach of Darwin ultra-complex world of molecular machinery and cellular systems that have been discovered in the last 40 years, we can say that Darwin's theory has "absolutely broken." 3
Irreducible complexity has demolished Darwinism, and showed that life is the product of intelligent design, which means that God created all living things. NG is how prevent this from his readers an escape reality.
Biogeographic stories GN
In his article in the NG, Quammen begins his account of the evidence that so-called Darwinism for the biogeography, and may be useful to provide a description of the concept at this time. Biogeography is a branch of science that studies the distribution species and geographic search for an answer to the question of how they came to these parts of the habitat by assigning your location on Earth.
The Most books in the field of biogeography are full of facts that do not say anything for or against the theory of evolution as maps of the areas habitat of living species, the characteristics of these areas, issues relating to the spread of organisms and species grouping based on geographic … 4
When their distribution on Earth is examined, one can see that species tend to worldwide distribution. Some species are more well dispersed in large groups in areas with climatic and environmental conditions. Since Darwin, evolutionists sought to account for this double as evidence of evolution but in regard to "basic categories of life 'in the geographical distribution of their efforts have failed to find a consistent scenario of evolution.
In his book Systematics and biogeography, G. and N. Platnick Nelson Museum of American History of New York Natural reviews studies in this area and establish its conclusion:
We conclude, therefore, that biogeography (or the geographical distribution of organisms) has not shown evidence for or against evolution in all directions. 5
If you really want to test evolutionary theory, then they should do is leave their stories tales about "if this is living here, then it must have evolved here, and if this thing is life over there, so it must have changed," and instead scientifically document their own answer to the question of how living things are born, first. (This an undeniable fact that the mechanisms of random mutation and natural selection can not explain the origin of species.)
The statements that the evolutionary biogeography of the myths without any scientific evidence clearly indicates Inspection Claims NG paleontology. The fossil record clearly shows that the idea that living beings transmitted by evolution is a myth.
Paleontology deception GN
NG allows a generalization about the fossil strata, telling his readers that the species called a close family usually found side by side in successive layers, and a lifestyle that dates back millions of years in one stratum is followed by a similar but not identical, one in the next layer. As an example of this generalization, equine sequence appointment Evolutionists even abandoned for years, argues that the modern horse appeared at the end of the sequence, and Epihippus Orohippus Hyracotherium Mohippus, fossils which are found in consecutive strata.
What is NG is here is a blatant deception. The sequence of the cabin sickness is an unfounded whose disability has been proven. If the setting is the case, send a generalization about the fossil record can not be described as nothing more than an attempt to verify the generalization of a misleading example.
The life forms emerged without changing parent, but in a moment, and with impeccable body structures
Darwin, who argued that living things arose through the expected degree of evolution and the fossil record to confirm that the request was received in future excavations, I was wrong. The fossils obtained in excavations carried out by the endless paleontologists around the world have openly refute results the idea of a gradual change in successive layers. These facts relate to the phenomena of sudden appearance and stasis.
The species appear suddenly, without fathers, but with the evolution flawless body structures. In his 1999 book Fossils and Evolution, Tom Kemp, curator of the Zoological Collection of the Oxford University Museum of Natural History, admits:
In almost all cases a new taxon appears for the first time in the fossil record features Final is already present, and practically no known forms of the mother group. 6
Fossils of the hundreds of million years without
follow the evolution invalidates neo-Darwinism
In addition, species may have no gradual change, as suggested by the widespread GN. The species with a natural history of hundreds of millions of years have a "stable" showing continuously throughout geological layers. The shark, the coelacanth, ants, salamanders and many other species, fossils have been discovered and which have remained unchanged for hundreds of millions of years have led paleontologists to accept as one of stasis the most striking aspects of the study of fossils. This refutes Darwinism is the prediction of gradual changes and invalidates the theory. Geology Professor Peter J. Williamson described in the journal Nature:
The main problem is morphological stasis. One theory is only as good as its predictions, and conventional neo-Darwinism, purporting to be a complete explanation of the evolutionary process, no generalization predicted long-term morphological stasis now recognized as one of the most striking aspects the study of fossils. 7
In short, GN demand change through geological layers of the cup is a myth supported in the face of the science of paleontology. How GN which aims to support that myth with the equine sequence makes things worse.
Truth in the sequence, equine NG tries to hide his readers
The equine sequence is based on several ungulate fossils found in North America. Define these Darwinists to establish a sequence, the characteristics of teeth fossils "and the number of toes, and for years since this term as evidence of Darwinism. palaeontological excavations continued without But finally revealed inconsistencies in this series. GN, known for his blind devotion to Darwinism, do not hesitate to hide this evolution of its readers and writing that the ancestors of the supposed evolution of the horse successfully in consecutive layers.
The former editor of the BBC science Gordon Rattray Taylor describes how the sequence equine evidence for Darwinism:
But perhaps the most serious weakness of Darwinism is the failure of paleontologists to find convincing phylogenies or sequences agencies that demonstrate large developmental changes … The horse is often cited as an example well developed. But the fact is that the line Eohippus of Equus is very erratic. It claims that show a steady increase in size, but the truth is that some of the alternatives Eohippus smaller, not more. Samples from different sources can be combined in a convincing-looking sequence, but there is no evidence that actually lined up in this order in time. 8
At a meeting in November 1980 at the Museum of Natural History in Chicago, attended by 150 evolutionists, a speakerphone, Boyce Rensberger, said there was no basis in the fossil records for the scenario of horse evolution, and progressive horse and never took place:
Example commonly spoken of horse evolution, suggesting a gradual sequence of changes in the four-toed creatures who live near Fox Business 50 million years become much more a horse of his fingers, has long been known is wrong. Instead of a gradual change, fossils of each species look completely different term, persist unchanged, and then vanished. transitional forms not known. 9
Discoveries that living things included in the imaginary order of horse evolution has actually lived in the same time, and together, refutes Quammen completely. One of the most striking examples of this occurred in 1981. The fossils of thousands of living creatures 10 million years, which had been buried under the lava after of a volcanic eruption and whose skeletons have been preserved until today, have been unearthed U.S. in the state of Nebraska. With this discovery, it appears that three-toed horses and only supposed to have lived in different times and has ancestral relationship between them in the context of the evolutionary sequence of equine imagination, lived side by side. Interestingly, the source of this information is NG magazine. 10
The myth of the evolution of whales
I see no difficulty in a race of bears being said, through natural selection, more aquatic in their structure and habits, with a mouth larger and larger, until there was a monstrous creature as a whale. 11
Fishery is looking over a River, Darwin expounded his ideas on the origin of whales in these terms in his book The Origin of Species but decided to delete the article in later editions of the book. However, evolutionists who came after Darwin did not hesitate on the adoption of this myth, with several minor changes, which fell as a monument to the unlimited nature of his imagination. Continued to propagate the myth that whales evolved bear but no other land mammals, as if it were a scientific fact.
Now you can see that NG, one of the leading figures of mythology Darwinian not behave differently, and tries to account for this great myth, supported by reasons of the doctrine of evolution, as the representation of the evidence for evolution.
There are huge differences in terms of base such as conservation of the physiological characteristics of water, light and communication between whales terrestrial mammals and their ancestors. Now consider the dilemma facing the scientific myth of evolution by examining the design of whales:
The special design of water conservation in the bodies of whales
Despite living in the water, whales can not meet their water needs of salt water marina. They need fresh water to live. Even though you do not know exactly how to meet their water needs, we believe that much of the latter is obtained by eating creatures containing sea salt concentrations are 30% lower than the ocean water.In this environment, where fresh water is extremely rare, maximum water retention in living bodies of things and minimal consumption of the latter are essential. Water levels are important for whales, so, like camels, whales No sweat. Your kidneys regulate the concentration of urine, so that the water supply.
Why did the whale fat milk?
Another sensitive balance requirements for water appears in the content of fat in the milk of the female whale. The mother whale feeds her babies with a very thick milk, cheese consistency. This milk is ten times more fat than human milk. There is a reason why this chemical milk contains a high level of fat. The water produced as by-products Fat is processed after being consumed by the baby. In this way, the mother responds to the needs of their children through the water with minimal water loss.
The design in the eyes of whales
There are complex arrangements in the design of the eye Whales and communications systems, there are no examples of which are found in terrestrial mammals. terrestrial mammals have eyelids to protect against dust and impact. Whales, however, have a hard coating to protect against a risk different, the pressure under the sea On the other hand, the refractive index in the design of the eye allows a killer whale jumping to catch a fish to six meters above the water amusement park with great precision. Moreover, the eyes of whales are on both sides of the head, unlike terrestrial mammals, protecting them and current. Thanks to the rod and cones of the eye, its level of sensitivity to light, color and other details are high. In addition to this relationship, the presence of phosphorus in eyes is a design that facilitates their ability to see in the dark depths of the oceans.
The mathematics used by the whales
The sense used for the whales to the location of food sources and one is a no real purpose, but rather hearing. Many whaling dark regions at the bottom of the sea thanks to a natural form of sonar. the brain of the whale emits clicking sounds in a manner not yet well understood by scientists. The distance of an object is determined by a mathematical calculation. The brains of whales multiply the speed at which the sounds hit an object and bounce for the time necessary for this, and divide the result by two. The result is the distance from the object itself. In addition, the whale also has the ability to focus sound waves with his brain on a specific point and the issue of a pulse, as the light. The waves are analyzed and interpreted in the brain of the animal. This interpretation determines how the body deals with it, its size, speed and position. animal's skull are soundproofed to protect against the bombing of the powerful sound waves emitted constantly and can even seriously damage the brain itself. The system animal sound is incredibly sensitive, so the U.S. Navy radar design mimics of marine mammals in the development of proprietary technology. 12
Special designs for calf
Designs perfect whales are by no means limited to these. The shape of the mouth of a calf is designed so that are perfectly suited to meet his mother's breasts, while the calf is able to suckle without losing a drop of milk and not having a drop of sea water also have lungs that store high levels of oxygen for long dives and slopes of the cone designed to protect high pressure.
These arrangements, each of which denotes a clear design, including whales and not to be found in all terrestrial mammals. GN, however, he expects readers to put aside I think the reason that all these came by chance. GN deny that whales are designed intelligently, maintaining instead that one day a mammal Land has chosen to live in the sea, the whale has been developed as a result of unconscious mechanisms like random mutation and natural selection.
However, the could cause changes in a mammal sonar would have been the ancestor of the whale? Having into account the effect of the mutations and the importance of the brain for survival of the whale, it is clear that mutations damage the brain, paralyzing or killing the whale. Could the brain, which produces sound waves, being able to focus these on a specific point and determine the location of objects The use of a mathematical calculation, the acquisition of sound in a perfect area to be damaged in this process to chance? As coincidence would produce a sound quality of the units that even the United States Navy 's technological development could not match? What changes could turn a land mammal feet in flippers and a tail capable of propelling several tons of weight?
There is no doubt that these questions can be asked with respect to systems that use water productively, milk the system and protection systems in the eye and ear. However, NG has a reasonable answer to these questions. There is only one answer. The whales were created fully formed at one time. God created the whale to be impeccable, with all systems to their needs, as did every living thing. In one verse of the Koran reveals that:
The humanity! Remember God's blessing for you. Is there any creator God to give you of heaven and earth? There is no god but He: So how have you been perverted? (Qur'an, 35: 3)
(For an answer More detailed history of the whale fantastic view http://www.harunyahya.com/70national_geographic_sci29.php GN)
GN error regarding embryology
Another error in the article in NG Quammen is the repetition of a myth formerly known as the "law of recapitulation. This belonged to the biologist German Ernst Haeckel and its application to the embryology Darwin largely "inspired" by Haeckel. Recapitulation law holds that the embryonic development of living things, repeat steps imagined that suffered during the descent of the ancestors is evolution.
The fact that Quammen devotes considerable space to this point in his article reveals a knowledge gap on their side. Complaints that Haeckel claims lacked scientific justification and proof that forged 136 years ago13 offered begun, and the final summary of the law debated by scientists from as far as 80 14. Even George Gaylord Simpson, one of the founders of neo-Darwinism, has admitted this fact 42 years ago in the words:
Haeckel bad beginning the evolution question. It is now clearly established that ontogeny does not repeats phylogeny. 15
Moreover, the myth of recapitulation, which has no qualms about GN's own summary of what is mentioned in a British embryologist 1997 as "the best known fraud in the history of biology." In his book Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (Natural History of Creation), written in 1868, Haeckel had deliberately distorted the image of man, monkey and dog embryos so that the support of his claim.
A striking aspect of this fraud is that it is also a monument "Centennial" in the Darwinist dogma. Until recently, a Darwinian number of sources, including textbooks, product a use of the drawings were counterfeit, or repeat the myth of recapitulation. Harvard University professor and evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould published a great sense common and offered the following criticism:
… [W] e do, I think, have the right to be both surprised and embarrassed by the silly century led to recycling the persistence of these drawings in many if not most, of modern textbooks! 16
NG did not use counterfeit designs. However, he has no no doubt about the wrap using a vacuum that has emerged at least 80 years, as support for Darwinism.
We urge consideration the words of Stephen GN Jay Gould.
GN errors regarding the morphology
Quammen shows an attitude of this article based on Darwin which handles complaints on the subject of morphology. The way a zoo is organized in birds, monkeys, large cats and crocodiles and fish in the aquarium is seen as evidence for evolution. As Quammen, the fact that living beings can be classified in a hierarchical system in families, orders and kingdoms must be the product of an evolutionary process.
However, Quammen ranking stereotypes of evidence for evolution is absurd. This is because the fact that life forms can be classified hierarchically is not a prediction was first proposed by evolutionists, then later confirmed. The Swedish scientist Carl Linnaeus, the father of modern classification system is a scientist who believes in the creation of anything, and felt that the classification as the product of intelligent design. This is consistent with what we see with our own eyes and is based in the right direction. The ability to be classified hierarchically is a well known feature of intelligent design. Media transport, for example, can be considered as land, air and sea vehicles, and can be divided into sub-categories and sub-groups small. However, this classification does not indicate that the modes of transport in question has arisen through evolution.
In fact, in an article published in the New Scientist, the eminent evolutionist Mark Ridley made the following statement:
The mere fact that the species can be classified hierarchically into genera families, and so on, is not an argument for evolution. You can sort any set of objects in a hierarchy of whether the variation is adaptive or not. 17
Quammen before conception
Similarly Quammen writes are so far from supporting his claim, but also shows how is based on prejudice and not on evidence Scientists:
The pattern of the levels of similarities? The groups of similar species nested within groupings large, and all descended from a single source? not naturally present in other collections of objects. You will not find anything remotely similar if classification is of rock or musical instruments or jewelry. Why not? Because rock types and styles of jewelry steady fall no common ancestors. Biodiversity ago. The number of common characteristics between species and another indicates how long ago two species diverged from a common ancestry. (P. 13)
Quammen placed hierarchical categorization of living in a separate place, reflecting a continuous chain of descent from a common ancestor. This term, however, is labeled Quammen impotent desperate attempts to prove Darwin right.
As explained above, there are no fossils that could be offered as evidence of an evolutionary link between categories of life. The words of the eminent evolutionist paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould as "the evolutionary trees adorn our textbooks are given only at the end and nodes of their branches "are a recognition that there is really no evidence for evolution of links assumed to exist in living organisms. 18
In summary, the origin of the evolutionary chain for claims descent Quammen between different categories of life is not a scientific fact, like fossils, but rather its own dogmatic mentality.
The skeletal structure of five-digit error
Quammen argues that the form of several vertebrates such as bats, dolphins and humans share a common feature of having five fingers of the descendants of an ancestor common. This assertion is based on that, although not the same basic plan on the front and hind legs of the living in question, they still can be easily differentiated (demand homology). This assertion Quammen obviously can confuse readers who do not know the facts of modern science. Advances in the field of biology molecular definitely refute this claim based on morphology. One surprising discovery leading to the production of these organisms, which represents an inheritance from a common ancestor, is in fact controlled by different genes in different creatures.
The evolutionary biologist William Fix describes the collapse of the evolutionary thesis on pentadactylism (having five digits) in this area in accordance with this discovery:
Textbooks on the evolution of that most older Part of the idea of homology, pointing out the obvious similarities between members of different animal skeletons. Therefore, the branch pentadactyl model 'is in the arms of a man, wing of a bird and a whale Flipper, which is necessary to indicate their common source. However, if these different structures have been transmitted by the same gene couples, varied from time to time by mutations and selection applied by the environment, the theory would be common sense. Unfortunately, this is not the case. homologous organs are now known to be produced by totally different gene complexes in different species,. The concept of homology in terms of similar genes transmission from a common ancestor has broken. 19
GN Vestigial Darwinism
Quammen shows a desire not to enter surprising that Darwin's arguments have been demolished by modern science. An example of this is repetition of the application of vestigial organs, a claim that is totally unrealistic. He keeps in article bodies such as the male nipple, said structures to be the remains of hind legs in some snakes, or beetles covered wings that are actually used, are redundant, with no function bodies left on the evolutionary process. Quammen is clearly ignore the final results of scientific progress:
List 180 supposed vestigial organs in the 20th century was finally reduced to almost nothing in the face of discoveries in scientific research. One by one, it is clear that many organs including the appendix and the semilunar plica turn implies that the vestigial organs has functions.20 "Science" is, in any case, the process by which humans come to know what was previously unknown. The gradual emergence function of organs that were once considered relics shows that, logically, functions of the past several organs whose functions are unknown others will be released soon.
In fact, many evolutionists have admitted today that the myth bodies "vestigial" is an argument rooted in ignorance. In an article titled "Do not vestigial organs represent evidence of evolution? published in the journal Evolutionary Theory, evolutionary biologist SR Scadding acknowledge this fact:
As it is not possible to unambiguously identify unnecessary structures since the structure of the argument used is not scientifically valid, I conclude that "vestigial organs" no specific evidence n'apportent for the theory of evolution. 21
Evolutionists claim relics of the organs do not come any vestigialism in these organs, but the nature of the remains of their own perspectives. The existence of any human being, proves the existence of God, his creator. And inanimate and unconscious atoms combine to produce a sound, smell, touch and see the human being is the proof of God's perfect creation. Whether it is impossible for the atoms, which can not feel, hear and see, want to have the perception and unite for this purpose. For collection of material to get up and look in front of a mirror, or the question of taste and touch, has no place in the logic of evolution. These feelings can not be explained in terms of a superior creation, ie the existence of God and His creation, no default. Notwithstanding this truth itself, evolutionists hold the irrational belief and blind, that are the product of matter and blind chance, indicating that its request for vestigial organs is based on biased and dogmatic perspective.
The realization that the bodies concerned by evolutionists as a vestige of responsibility has not done is a test. For example, the structures appear as vestiges of hind limbs in some species of snakes are now known to help them understand one another during mating. As for male nipples and the product an evolutionary process is also based on an erroneous logic. If the man nipples or nipples were a relic of an evolutionary process, then men must have evolved from a population composed entirely of women, an evolutionary scenario unimaginable when he thought he could not accept. Coleoptera, a further example cited by Quammen, there is also evidence of evolution. insect species that do not develop a functional wing generally held in open habitats with high winds, as the islands of the ocean. In an environment where strong winds and surrounded by large bodies of water, insects can fly is not an advantage, and can even be dangerous. This is due to the insects that fly in air are exposed to the effects of wind and can be placed on trees or rocks, are found dead or maimed. It may, therefore, have tended to move toward an apartment lifestyle. Over time, populations of insects that live near the ground is composed of people who do not develop full wings. That's because, unlike of flying insects mutations that prevent the insects that live near low-wing development can not be harmful to the insect (the provision that do not cause an interruption physiology total).
Mutation that prevented the development of the wings in a flying insect living in a habitat affected by the winds would be harmful and perhaps even fatal. Because, normally, an insect that uses its wings to feed and avoid predators do not have wings because the function of this change and would be unable to survive and therefore eliminated from the population.
Moreover, in insects that live in a habitat affected by the winds and have used their feet to move same as flightless insects, a mutation in the wings could not be fatal. Because the insects are already accustomed to a lifestyle that does not use the wings, and not make any difference if their wings are in good health, or lose their function, because mutation (if the mutation in question is not one that affects the general physiology of the insect). In short, a mutation that causes the destruction the loss of the wings of an insect can be fatal in an environment in which the wings are in any case does not matter.
However, you can not say the beetles that are supposed to have undergone such a process is proof of evolution. The theory of evolution proposes that organs gradually into a more complex form. The genetic changes proposed in support of this claim must be such as to add new DNA genetic information of the creatures. "It is clear, however, that the beetle has not received any new genetic information during this process and however, suffer a loss of information in the genes that control development of the wing.
Genetic information is the acquisition, which was not seen in beetles, are respected in any other living being? Of course not. Evolutionists were unable to demonstrate the emergence of a new body, or even a new protein, through random mutations.
In short, the theory of evolution maintains that living things acquire new organs with the addition of new information Genetic their DNA, but the vestigial organ argument has to do with a loss of function, ie a loss of genetic data. Therefore, organs vestigial not provide scientific support to the theory of evolution. The reason evolutionists desire to put this claim in the scientific program is psychological rather than scientific. The display of devotion to materialism leads them to blindly adopt the residual perspective evident truth of creation. (You can read the article by Harun Yahya that destroys the vestigial evolutionary perspective here. Http: / / www.darwinism-watch.com/hurriyet_science0407.php)
Jacques P. Gills, MD, founder and laser cataract St. Luke's Institute in Tarpon Springs, Florida, is a creationist scientist. It is also a world renowned ophthalmologist. In his book Darwin under the microscope, a number of tests Gills appointment of creation that will totally undermine evolution, and wrote that the only reason why scientists continue to insist on changes Cataract is the spiritual thought of themselves as the product of blind chance. 22
The error of thinking resistance to antibiotics and DDT is evidence of evolution
The section aims to show that immunity to antibiotics and resistance GN insects to pesticides such as DDT is evidence of evolution. On the issue of microbial resistance to drugs Quammen states seem to develop confidence:
There is no greater or more immediate evidence to support Darwin's theory of the forced transformation among our enemy germs. (P. 21)
However, in the representation of the bacterial immunity Quammen enthusiasm as evidence of evolution is totally out of place. It then explains why these two phenomena are not evidence for Darwinism.
The first of these molecules "Mortal" used against microorganisms was penicillin, discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1928. Fleming discovered a molecule that has killed Staphylococcus bacteria mold, after which antibiotics taken from microorganisms have been used against various bacteria. Although it appears prima facie that the final results were obtained, the truth later emerged: the bacteria develop resistance antibiotics gradually. The vast majority of bacteria exposed to antibiotics die, but a small minority are affected, which multiply rapidly and eventually the entire population. Therefore, the entire population becomes resistant to the antibiotic.
However, it is not a question of development of bacteria through mutation here, because bacteria already possess the characteristics in question before being exposed to antibiotics. Despite being an evolutionist publication, Scientific American magazine has recognized these facts in its issue of March 1998:
Many bacteria possess resistance genes even before commercial antibiotics came into use. Scientists do not know exactly why these genes have evolved and been maintained. 23
Insects develop resistance to pesticides such as DDT in the same way, and again the same way, this is not proof of evolution.
The eminent evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala accepts the truth of these words:
Variants necessary for genetic resistance to various types of pesticides were apparently present in each population exposed to these compounds by humans. 24
One of those to do more detailed research on this subject is the biophysicist Dr. Lee Spetner Israelis. In his book is not an accident, published in 1997 showed that immunity is due to bacteria Spetner by two different mechanisms but these are not compatible with the theory of evolution. For more details on this topic, see http://www.harunyahya.com/20questions05.php Q19 # and http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/embryology_01.html)
Another piece of evidence known to the NG article, and more resistance in bacteria and insects, genetically similar concerns.
The disappointment of that evolution can be observed
NG asserts that evolution can actually see in the nature and laboratory. This, however, is a frivolous lawsuit without merit. An article entitled A "New Way How many species?" published in the edition of June 14, 2003, issue of New Scientist, George Turner made the important "admission"
Not long ago, we thought we knew how species formed. It was felt that the process began almost always a complete separation of the population. It has often occurred after a population suffered a severe "genetic bottleneck", as can happen after a pregnant woman were taken away on a remote island and their offspring were mated them. The beauty of this founder effect "called" model is that could be tested in the laboratory. In reality, simply does not hold. Despite the efforts of biologists Evolutionists "Nobody has even approached the creation of a new species of a founder population. Moreover, as far as we know, no new species has been formed as a result of the liberation of human beings a small number of organisms in extraterrestrial environments. 25
As we have seen, evolutionists not actually know how new species are formed. In other words, Quammen's claim to be able to witness evolution in action is totally without foundation. The fact that the long years of study grants the length of the beaks of finches on the Galapagos Islands is cited in support of Darwinism is the result of changes represent deformation of the test itself. (For more information, see http://www.harunyahya.com/nas04.php)
Conclusion
As we have seen, Darwin was wrong. National Geographic to raise the question of whether it was wrong is as ridiculous as asking "Is Freud wrong? Or" Marx wrong? This is because, like Freudianism and Marxism, Darwinism is a theory that has reached the end of his life. We call NG magazine to abandon its support for this outdated myth and accept that creation is the true origin of life.
GN What you should do is put aside their prejudices and stop supporting Darwinism as a dogma, and to cope with scientific evidence that undermines this theory. Discoveries in the past 40 years, in particular, have definitely proved the invalidity of naturalistic philosophy in the heart of Darwinism. If GN is responsible for this fact will be that the complexity of organized life and genetic information that depend on intelligent design is ie, that life evolved on their own by chance and natural phenomena, but has "created."
NG – and all Darwinists others – have avoided until now cope with this, and therefore can be used to hide the difficulties of the theory. However, they must be aware that this escape is not helpful for keeping his theory of life. Because a major development in the world of science is that the age of sweeping issues under the carpet ended.
How intelligent design movement, which has been sweeping the United States in the last 10 years, has discovered one by one the principles of Darwinism, has been of great interest. The intellectual foundation of this movement is the theory of intelligent design. " The theory in question holds that complex biological structures containing large amounts of information can not be explained in terms of causes based on intelligence, and that these causes can be studied empirically in the field of biology. 26
An indication that the movement Intelligent design may represent the dynamics of cultural change is how big that is effective and shows a generalized the evidence of long taught as a test of Darwinism in schools is actually composed of myth, deception and fraud, even. California Teacher University of Berkeley Phillip E. Johnson, leader of the movement, said that Darwinism going on in the dustbin of history during this century. 27
It will be useful GN recall damage determines the persistence in his criticism of Darwinism defense policy. We recall that the GN has announced the discovery of fossils Archaeoraptor discovered in China as proof that birds evolved from dinosaurs, without having to wait until it is described in scientific journals on the list. Later however, we realized that the fossil does not represent a missing link at all, but it was fake "product" by a Chinese because of their peasant.26 NG blind devotion to Darwinism did not hesitate to embrace the first fossil "Evidence" unscientific methods, and later found in "The modern paleontology greatest shame. "29
According to Dr. Storrs Olson, an ornithologist, one National Geographic has reached a record low for exercise of sensational, unsubstantiated, tabloid journalism '30.
The representation of the application of the recapitulation, which killed at least 80 years, as evidence of evolution in Article NG "Darwin was wrong" shows that it lacks the seriousness of science and continues his unfounded tabloid journalism. "GN does not behave intelligently. Maintaining this approach does not provide support for Darwinism. On the contrary, NG is the documentation for your own dogmatism increasingly evident.
NG invite to examine these points and to accept that creation is the true origin of life.
There is no doubt that the Lord of all beings on Earth in the sky, and between God. At a Koranic verse, God reveals:
Your God is one God. There is no god but He, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. (Qur'an, 2: 163)
Under the pseudonym Harun Yahya Adnan Oktar has written around 250 work. His books contain a total of 46,000 pages and 31,500 illustrations. Of these books, 7,000 pages and 6,000 illustrations deal with the collapse theory of evolution. Are available free of charge, all the books Adnan Oktar has written under the pen name Harun Yahya on these websites www.harunyahya.com
1. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, Center for Electronic Text Library of the University of Virginia.
2. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A facsimile of the first edition, Harvard University Press, 1964, p. 189.
3. Michael Behe, Darwin's Black Box, 1996
4. For more information on thesis on evolutionary biogeography Please see Walter J. Remini, "The Biotic Message: Evolution versus Theory messages, "St. Paul Science, First Edition ed, 1993. page 538.
5. G. Nelson and N. Platnick, Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance, Columbia University Press, 1981, p. 223.
6. Evolution Fossils, Dr TS Kemp – Curator of Zoological Collections, University of Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 246.
7. Peter G. Williamson, "a morphological stasis, and constraints for development: real problems for neo-Darwinism," Nature, vol 294. November 19, 1981, p. 214, Stephen E. Jones, Sihon http://members.iinet.net.au/ ~ /
8. Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Mystery of great change, Abacus, Sphere Books, London, 1984 230.
9. Boyce Rensberger, Houston Chronicle November 5, 1980 15.
October. MR Voorhies, "Create an ashfall animal ancient Pompeii prehistoric, "National Geographic, vol. 159, No. 1, January 1981 pp.67-68, 74," Horse Search defy evolution "Creation Ex Nihilo 5 (3): January 15, 1983, http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/3723.asp
11. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the first edition, Harvard University Press, 1964, p. 184.
12. Detect mines Dolphin Sonar scienceNOW 1 998: 2
13 L. Rutimeyer, "Referate," Archiv für Anthropologie, 1868
Keith S. 14 Thompson, ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny and "American Scientist, vol. 76, May / June 1988, p. 273
15 GG Simpson, W. Beck Introduction to Biology, Harcourt Brace & World, New York, 1965, p. 241.
16 Stephen Jay Gould, "Abscheulich! – Atrocious! – The precursor of the selection theory Natural, Natural History, March 2000, p. 45.
17 Mark Ridley who doubts evolution? New Scientist, vol. 90 (June 25, 1981), p. 832.
18 SJ Gould, "Progress irregular development," History Nature, May 1977 p. 13-14.
19 William Fix, hawkers Bone: Evolution of sales, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, 1984, p. 189.
20 J. Bergman & G. Howe vestigial organs are fully functional, CRS Books, Terre Haute, IN, 1990.
21 Scadding SR, "Do" The evidence of vestigial organs "expect this trend? Evolutionary Theory, Vol. May 5, 1981, p. 173.
22 James P. Gills, And Thomas Woodward MD, Ph.D., the Darwinism in the microscope, Charisma House, 2002, P. 39.
Stuart B. 23 Levy, "The challenge of antibiotic resistance" Scientific American, March 1998, p. 35
24 Francisco J. Ayala, "Mechanisms of Evolution, Scientific American, vol. 239, September 1978, p. 64
25 George Turner: "How are new species formed?", New Scientist, Vol 178, No. 2399, June 14, 2003, pp 36
26 http://www.arn.org, Http: / / www.discovery.org/csc/
Phillip E. 27 Johnson, 'freezing Science, Touchstone Magazine, December 2003
28 For more information on Archaeoraptor false, please see # Q7 http://www.harunyahya.com/20questions03.php
29 Tim Friend, said the "missing link" fossil that has not been 'USA Today, 01/02/2000
30 Open Letter to National Geographic Society by Storrs L. Olson, curator of birds, the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
About the Author
ABOUT THE AUTHOR, HARUN YAHYA
Born in Ankara in 1956, Adnan Oktar writes his books under the pen name of Harun Yahya. Ever since his university years, he has dedicated his life to telling of the existence and oneness of Almighty Allah, and to disseminating the moral values of the Qur’an. He has never wavered in the face of difficulties and despite oppression, still continues this intellectual struggle today exhibiting great patience and determination. For mor information pls visit: http://www.harunyahya.com/theauthor.php
|
|
Vac-u-lock Attachment 6 Ur3 $21.40 andquot;The 6 Inch UR3 Vac-U-Lock c*ck and Balls Attachment is no imitation…Itandacute;s the Real Thing, molded directly from an erect penis, then hand painted to insure every detail is true… |
|
|
Berman Center Athena Waterproof Mini Massager … |
|
|
Doc Johnson ‘Super Sucker’ Stroker $16.99 Doc Johnson presents The Super Sucker, the masturbator with a real-mouth sensation! Our Super Sucker is ideal for guys that need extra stimulation to satisfy their cravings. Made of UR3 for an |
|
|
Doc Johnson Decadence Ripples Vibrator $14.99 Doc Johnson Decadence Ripples Purple Vibrator This vibrating sex toy is a must for any women. This vibrator isn’t just your ordinary sex toy. The sex toy sends waves of pleasure straight to your |
|
|
Doc $13.58 Doc |
|
|
Doc Johnson ‘Reflections: Hope’ Spiral Glass Vibrator $24.99 The DJ Glass Reflections Hope pink vibrator is a pink multi-speed vibrator from Doc Johnson®, one of the most reputable names in adult toys. Along with a very sexy pink color it features a raised |
|
|
Doc Johnson ‘G-spot Tickler’ Bullet Vibrator $14.99 A Doc Johnson exclusive! Designed to simultaneously stimulate both the G-Spot and the clitoris two of the most erogenous zones on a womans body. The G-Spot Tickler is a 3″ long Jelly Thumb vibe |
|
|
Doc Johnson Black Magic Mystical Squirmy $49.99 Black Magic Mystical Squirmy |
|
|
Doc Johnson Decadence Vibe G Spot Pink $19.99 Decadence Vibe G Spot Pink |
|
|
Doc Johnson Decadence Vibe Ripples Peach $19.99 Decadence Vibe Ripples Peach |